October 2017 News

US Opposes CPEC, Says It Passes Through 'Disputed Area'

7 October 2017
Kashmir Observer

Washington DC: The Trump administration has informed Congress that it too believes the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) passes through a disputed territory - originally an India claim aimed at thwarting the multibillion-dollar plan which connects China to Arabian sea. The $56 billion CPEC passes through Gilgit-Baltistan which Pakis­t­an calls its northern areas and India claims it to be part of the disputed Jammu and Kashmir territory. 'The One Belt, One Road also goes through disputed territory, and I think that in itself shows the vulnerability of trying to establish that sort of a dictate,' US Defence Secretary James Mattis told the Senate Armed Services Committee. Secretary Mattis and Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen Joseph Dun­­­ford ap­­peared before the Sen­ate and House armed services panel earlier this week to brief US lawmakers on the current situation in the Pak-Afghan region. Secretary Mattis said the US oppo­sed the One Belt, One Road policy in principle because in a globalised world, there were many belts and many roads, and no one nation shou­­ld put itself into a position of dictating One Belt, One Road. He also emphasized the reason US opposes the ongoing work in Pakistan is because it passes through disputed territory. The new US position on CPEC will further strain already tense rel­ations between the US and Pakistan, which also opposed the greater role Washington has assigned to India in Afghanistan in a strategy President Trump announced on Aug 21. 'As far as Afghan­is­tan goes, as we try to separate out variables where, in some areas, we work with China, for example, terrorism - I think there are areas where we can work - find common ground with China when it comes to counterterrorism, and we should exercise those areas pretty fully,' said the US defence chief. 'But we should be under no illusions,' he warned. 'There are areas where, also, strategically, we need to confront China where we think it's unproductive - the direction they're going in.'